SEO Sydney

SEO Sydney

Google keyword planner

action-oriented keywords"Action-oriented keywords encourage users to take a specific step, such as download, register, or learn. Best SEO Sydney Agency. Best SEO Agency Sydney Australia. By targeting these terms, you guide visitors toward meaningful interactions on your site."

advanced image compression techniquesAdvanced image compression techniques use modern algorithms to reduce file size while maintaining quality. Techniques such as WebP or SVG compression help ensure that your images look great without slowing down your website.

advanced image optimization techniques"Advanced techniques, including responsive image sets and modern compression formats, enhance visual quality and load speed. By using cutting-edge methods, you maintain a competitive edge and ensure optimal user experience."

algorithm update tracking"Algorithm update tracking involves monitoring search engine changes that affect rankings. By staying informed, businesses can adjust strategies quickly, maintain strong rankings, and continue driving organic traffic."

alt text for images"Alt text describes the content of images for search engines and visually impaired users. Best Search Engine Optimisation Services. By adding descriptive, keyword-rich alt text, you improve image accessibility, boost SEO, and help your content appear in image search results."

alt text for imagesAlt text for images provides a written description that helps search engines understand the content of the image. Including relevant keywords and accurate descriptions improves accessibility and increases the chances of the image appearing in search results.

SEO Sydney

Seo Facebook

SEO Google


SEO Blogs

Citations and other Useful links

The Role of Content Creation in Building Brand Authority

The Role of Content Creation in Building Brand Authority

Consistently producing high-quality content helps establish your brand as an industry leader and boosts credibility.

Posted by SEO Sydney on

Top Strategies for Boosting Your Local SEO

Top Strategies for Boosting Your Local SEO

Implementing effective local SEO tactics can significantly improve your business�s visibility and credibility in your area.

Posted by SEO Sydney on

How Image Optimization Enhances SEO and User Engagement

How Image Optimization Enhances SEO and User Engagement

Well-optimized images improve page speed, accessibility, and overall user satisfaction, which boosts SEO performance.

Posted by SEO Sydney on

Why Image Optimization Is Crucial for Website Performance

Why Image Optimization Is Crucial for Website Performance

Properly optimized images enhance page speed, user experience, and search engine rankings.

Posted by SEO Sydney on

advanced image optimization techniques

anchor text optimization"Anchor text optimization involves using descriptive, relevant text for hyperlinks. SEO Packages Sydney . By strategically choosing anchor text, businesses can signal the contents topic to search engines, improve keyword rankings, and create a better navigation experience for users."

Anchor text optimization"Anchor text optimization ensures that the clickable text of your backlinks is relevant and natural. By using a variety of anchor textssuch as branded terms, keywords, and generic phrasesyou create a more diverse link profile that can help improve your search rankings."

automated image optimization"Automated image optimization uses tools and plugins to handle compression, resizing, and metadata updates without manual input. Automation speeds up the optimization process, reduces errors, and ensures consistent quality."

advanced image optimization techniques
algorithm update tracking

algorithm update tracking

Backlink analysis"Backlink analysis examines the incoming links pointing to your website to assess their quality and relevance. By understanding which links are helping or harming your sites authority, you can refine your link building efforts and focus on acquiring more valuable backlinks."

backlink building"Backlink building focuses on acquiring high-quality links from other websites that point to your own.

SEO Sydney - Google crawl budget

  • Search ranking fluctuations
  • Search engine indexing guidelines
These links serve as a signal of credibility and authority, helping improve a sites search rankings and driving referral traffic from trusted sources."

behavioral keywordsBehavioral keywords are terms that reflect the actions or behaviors of your audience. Understanding these keywords helps you create content that aligns with user interests and encourages engagement.

alt text for images

Best SEO agency Sydney"Sydneys best SEO agencies deliver outstanding results through tailored strategies and a commitment to excellence. By focusing on technical optimization, content creation, and data analysis, these agencies help businesses achieve higher rankings, drive traffic, and increase conversions."

Best SEO company in Sydney"The best SEO company in Sydney offers proven strategies, exceptional customer service, and measurable results.

SEO Sydney - Google crawl budget

  1. Google keyword planner
  2. Keyword phrase variations
By combining technical expertise, creative content, and data-driven insights, these companies help businesses achieve higher rankings, increased traffic, and improved conversions."

Best SEO company Sydney"Sydneys best SEO companies offer proven strategies, exceptional customer service, and measurable results. By combining technical expertise, creative content, and data-driven insights, these companies help businesses achieve higher rankings, increased traffic, and improved conversions."

alt text for images
alt text for images
alt text for images

Best SEO Sydney"The best SEO providers in Sydney offer customized solutions that improve website performance, increase rankings, and drive organic traffic. By combining technical expertise, creative content strategies, and ongoing support, these providers help businesses achieve sustained success in a competitive digital landscape."

Black-hat link building risks"Black-hat link building risks include penalties, de-indexing, and long-term damage to your sites reputation. While these tactics may produce quick results, they often lead to severe consequences that outweigh any short-term gains."

Blogger outreach"Blogger outreach involves reaching out to bloggers in your industry to request backlinks or content collaborations. By building relationships with influential bloggers, you can earn high-quality links and expand your reach within your niche."



SEO Sydney - Google keyword planner

  • Google crawl budget
  • Google algorithm
  • Search relevance signals
anchor text optimization

bounce rate optimization"Bounce rate optimization involves reducing the number of visitors who leave a website without interacting further. By improving content relevance, page load times, and site design, businesses can keep users engaged longer, signaling to search engines that the site provides value."

brand comparison keywordsBrand comparison keywords focus on how your products or services stack up against competitors. Creating content around these comparisons helps users make informed decisions and builds trust in your brand.

Branded anchor textBranded anchor text uses your company or website name as the clickable text for a backlink. This approach helps maintain a natural link profile and strengthens your brands visibility in search results.

anchor text optimization

A web directory or link directory is an online list or catalog of websites. That is, it is a directory on the World Wide Web of (all or part of) the World Wide Web. Historically, directories typically listed entries on people or businesses, and their contact information; such directories are still in use today. A web directory includes entries about websites, including links to those websites, organized into categories and subcategories.[1][2][3] Besides a link, each entry may include the title of the website, and a description of its contents. In most web directories, the entries are about whole websites, rather than individual pages within them (called "deep links"). Websites are often limited to inclusion in only a few categories.

There are two ways to find information on the Web: by searching or browsing. Web directories provide links in a structured list to make browsing easier. Many web directories combine searching and browsing by providing a search engine to search the directory. Unlike search engines, which base results on a database of entries gathered automatically by web crawler, most web directories are built manually by human editors. Many web directories allow site owners to submit their site for inclusion, and have editors review submissions for fitness.

Web directories may be general in scope, or limited to particular subjects or fields. Entries may be listed for free, or by paid submission (meaning the site owner must pay to have his or her website listed).

RSS directories are similar to web directories, but contain collections of RSS feeds, instead of links to websites.

History

[edit]

During the early development of the web, there was a list of web servers edited by Tim Berners-Lee and hosted on the CERN webserver. One historical snapshot from 1992 remains.[4] He also created the World Wide Web Virtual Library, which is the oldest web directory.[5]

Scope of listing

[edit]

Most of the directories are general in on scope and list websites across a wide range of categories, regions and languages. But some niche directories focus on restricted regions, single languages, or specialist sectors. For example, there are shopping directories that specialize in the listing of retail e-commerce sites.

Examples of well-known general web directories are Yahoo! Directory (shut down at the end of 2014) and DMOZ (shut down on March 14, 2017). DMOZ was significant due to its extensive categorization and large number of listings and its free availability for use by other directories and search engines.[6]

However, a debate over the quality of directories and databases still continues, as search engines use DMOZ's content without real integration, and some experiment using clustering.

Development

[edit]

There have been many attempts to make building web directories easier, such as using automated submission of related links by script, or any number of available PHP portals and programs. Recently, social software techniques have spawned new efforts of categorization, with Amazon.com adding tagging to their product pages.

Monetizing

[edit]

Directories have various features in their listings, often depending upon the price paid for inclusion:

  • Cost
    • Free submission – there is no charge for the review and listing of the site
    • Paid submission – a one-time or recurring fee is charged for reviewing/listing the submitted link
  • No follow – there is a rel="nofollow" attribute associated with the link, meaning search engines will give no weight to the link
  • Featured listing – the link is given a premium position in a category (or multiple categories) or other sections of the directory, such as the homepage. Sometimes called sponsored listing.
  • Bid for position – where sites are ordered based on bids
  • Affiliate links – where the directory earns commission for referred customers from the listed websites
  • Reciprocity
    • Reciprocal link – a link back to the directory must be added somewhere on the submitted site in order to get listed in the directory. This strategy has decreased in popularity due to changes in SEO algorithms which can make it less valuable or counterproductive.[7]
    • No Reciprocal link – a web directory where you will submit your links for free and no need to add link back to your website

Human-edited web directories

[edit]

A human-edited directory is created and maintained by editors who add links based on the policies particular to that directory. Human-edited directories are often targeted by SEOs on the basis that links from reputable sources will improve rankings in the major search engines. Some directories may prevent search engines from rating a displayed link by using redirects, nofollow attributes, or other techniques. Many human-edited directories, including DMOZ, World Wide Web Virtual Library, Business.com and Jasmine Directory, are edited by volunteers, who are often experts in particular categories. These directories are sometimes criticized due to long delays in approving submissions, or for rigid organizational structures and disputes among volunteer editors.

In response to these criticisms, some volunteer-edited directories have adopted wiki technology, to allow broader community participation in editing the directory (at the risk of introducing lower-quality, less objective entries).

Another direction taken by some web directories is the paid for inclusion model. This method enables the directory to offer timely inclusion for submissions and generally fewer listings as a result of the paid model. They often offer additional listing options to further enhance listings, including features listings and additional links to inner pages of the listed website. These options typically have an additional fee associated but offer significant help and visibility to sites and/or their inside pages.

Today submission of websites to web directories is considered a common SEO (search engine optimization) technique to get back-links for the submitted website. One distinctive feature of 'directory submission' is that it cannot be fully automated like search engine submissions. Manual directory submission is a tedious and time-consuming job and is often outsourced by webmasters.

Bid for Position directories

[edit]

Bid for Position directories, also known as bidding web directories, are paid-for-inclusion web directories where the listings of websites in the directory are ordered according to their bid amount. They are special in that the more a person pays, the higher up the list of websites in the directory they go. With the higher listing, the website becomes more visible and increases the chances that visitors who browse the directory will click on the listing.

Propagation

[edit]

Web directories will often make themselves accessing by more and more URLs by acquiring the domain registrations of defunct websites as soon as they expire, a practice known as Domain drop catching.

See also

[edit]
Link destinations
Types of web directory
Other link organization and presentation systems

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Web directory". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  2. ^ Wendy Boswell. "What is a Web Directory". About.com. Archived from the original on 2010-01-07. Retrieved 2010-02-25.
  3. ^ "Web Directory Or Directories". yourmaindomain. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
  4. ^ "World-Wide Web Servers". W3C. Retrieved 2012-05-14.
  5. ^ Aaron Wall. "History of Search Engines: From 1945 to Google Today". Search Engine History. Retrieved 2017-05-16.
  6. ^ Paul Festa (December 27, 1999), Web search results still have human touch, CNET News.com, retrieved September 18, 2007
  7. ^ Schmitz, Tom (August 2, 2012). "What Everyone Needs To Know About Good, Bad & Bland Links". searchengineland.com. Third Door Media. Retrieved April 21, 2017. Reciprocal links may not help with competitive keyword rankings, but that does not mean you should avoid them when they make sound business sense. What you should definitely avoid are manipulative reciprocal linking schemes like automated link trading programs and three-way links or four-way links.
[edit]

 

 

An annotated example of a domain name

In the Internet, a domain name is a string that identifies a realm of administrative autonomy, authority or control. Domain names are often used to identify services provided through the Internet, such as websites, email services and more. Domain names are used in various networking contexts and for application-specific naming and addressing purposes. In general, a domain name identifies a network domain or an Internet Protocol (IP) resource, such as a personal computer used to access the Internet, or a server computer.

Domain names are formed by the rules and procedures of the Domain Name System (DNS). Any name registered in the DNS is a domain name. Domain names are organized in subordinate levels (subdomains) of the DNS root domain, which is nameless. The first-level set of domain names are the top-level domains (TLDs), including the generic top-level domains (gTLDs), such as the prominent domains com, info, net, edu, and org, and the country code top-level domains (ccTLDs). Below these top-level domains in the DNS hierarchy are the second-level and third-level domain names that are typically open for reservation by end-users who wish to connect local area networks to the Internet, create other publicly accessible Internet resources or run websites, such as "wikipedia.org". The registration of a second- or third-level domain name is usually administered by a domain name registrar who sell its services to the public.

A fully qualified domain name (FQDN) is a domain name that is completely specified with all labels in the hierarchy of the DNS, having no parts omitted. Traditionally a FQDN ends in a dot (.) to denote the top of the DNS tree.[1] Labels in the Domain Name System are case-insensitive, and may therefore be written in any desired capitalization method, but most commonly domain names are written in lowercase in technical contexts.[2] A hostname is a domain name that has at least one associated IP address.

Purpose

[edit]

Domain names serve to identify Internet resources, such as computers, networks, and services, with a text-based label that is easier to memorize than the numerical addresses used in the Internet protocols. A domain name may represent entire collections of such resources or individual instances. Individual Internet host computers use domain names as host identifiers, also called hostnames. The term hostname is also used for the leaf labels in the domain name system, usually without further subordinate domain name space. Hostnames appear as a component in Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) for Internet resources such as websites (e.g., en.wikipedia.org).

Domain names are also used as simple identification labels to indicate ownership or control of a resource. Such examples are the realm identifiers used in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), the Domain Keys used to verify DNS domains in e-mail systems, and in many other Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs).

An important function of domain names is to provide easily recognizable and memorizable names to numerically addressed Internet resources. This abstraction allows any resource to be moved to a different physical location in the address topology of the network, globally or locally in an intranet. Such a move usually requires changing the IP address of a resource and the corresponding translation of this IP address to and from its domain name.

Domain names are used to establish a unique identity. Organizations can choose a domain name that corresponds to their name, helping Internet users to reach them easily.

A generic domain is a name that defines a general category, rather than a specific or personal instance, for example, the name of an industry, rather than a company name. Some examples of generic names are books.com, music.com, and travel.info. Companies have created brands based on generic names, and such generic domain names may be valuable.[3]

Domain names are often simply referred to as domains and domain name registrants are frequently referred to as domain owners, although domain name registration with a registrar does not confer any legal ownership of the domain name, only an exclusive right of use for a particular duration of time. The use of domain names in commerce may subject them to trademark law.

History

[edit]

The practice of using a simple memorable abstraction of a host's numerical address on a computer network dates back to the ARPANET era, before the advent of today's commercial Internet. In the early network, each computer on the network retrieved the hosts file (host.txt) from a computer at SRI (now SRI International),[4][5] which mapped computer hostnames to numerical addresses. The rapid growth of the network made it impossible to maintain a centrally organized hostname registry and in 1983 the Domain Name System was introduced on the ARPANET and published by the Internet Engineering Task Force as RFC 882 and RFC 883.

The following table shows the first five .com domains with the dates of their registration:[6]

 
Domain name Registration date
symbolics.com 15 March 1985
bbn.com 24 April 1985
think.com 24 May 1985
mcc.com 11 July 1985
dec.com 30 September 1985

and the first five .edu domains:[7]

 
Domain name Registration date
berkeley.edu 24 April 1985
cmu.edu 24 April 1985
purdue.edu 24 April 1985
rice.edu 24 April 1985
ucla.edu 24 April 1985

Domain name space

[edit]
The hierarchical domain name system, organized into zones, each served by domain name servers

Today, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) manages the top-level development and architecture of the Internet domain name space. It authorizes domain name registrars, through which domain names may be registered and reassigned.

The hierarchy of labels in a fully qualified domain name

The domain name space consists of a tree of domain names. Each node in the tree holds information associated with the domain name. The tree sub-divides into zones beginning at the DNS root zone.

Domain name syntax

[edit]

A domain name consists of one or more parts, technically called labels, that are conventionally concatenated, and delimited by dots, such as example.com.

  • The right-most label conveys the top-level domain; for example, the domain name www.example.com belongs to the top-level domain com.
  • The hierarchy of domains descends from the right to the left label in the name; each label to the left specifies a subdivision, or subdomain of the domain to the right. For example: the label example specifies a node example.com as a subdomain of the com domain, and www is a label to create www.example.com, a subdomain of example.com. Each label may contain from 1 to 63 octets. The empty label is reserved for the root node and when fully qualified is expressed as the empty label terminated by a dot. The full domain name may not exceed a total length of 253 ASCII characters in its textual representation.[8]
  • A hostname is a domain name that has at least one associated IP address. For example, the domain names www.example.com and example.com are also hostnames, whereas the com domain is not. However, other top-level domains, particularly country code top-level domains, may indeed have an IP address, and if so, they are also hostnames.
  • Hostnames impose restrictions on the characters allowed in the corresponding domain name. A valid hostname is also a valid domain name, but a valid domain name may not necessarily be valid as a hostname.

Top-level domains

[edit]

When the Domain Name System was devised in the 1980s, the domain name space was divided into two main groups of domains.[9] The country code top-level domains (ccTLD) were primarily based on the two-character territory codes of ISO-3166 country abbreviations. In addition, a group of seven generic top-level domains (gTLD) was implemented which represented a set of categories of names and multi-organizations.[10] These were the domains gov, edu, com, mil, org, net, and int. These two types of top-level domains (TLDs) are the highest level of domain names of the Internet. Top-level domains form the DNS root zone of the hierarchical Domain Name System. Every domain name ends with a top-level domain label.

During the growth of the Internet, it became desirable to create additional generic top-level domains. As of October 2009, 21 generic top-level domains and 250 two-letter country-code top-level domains existed.[11] In addition, the ARPA domain serves technical purposes in the infrastructure of the Domain Name System.

During the 32nd International Public ICANN Meeting in Paris in 2008,[12] ICANN started a new process of TLD naming policy to take a "significant step forward on the introduction of new generic top-level domains." This program envisions the availability of many new or already proposed domains, as well as a new application and implementation process.[13] Observers believed that the new rules could result in hundreds of new top-level domains to be registered.[14] In 2012, the program commenced, and received 1930 applications.[15] By 2016, the milestone of 1000 live gTLD was reached.

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains an annotated list of top-level domains in the DNS root zone database.[16]

For special purposes, such as network testing, documentation, and other applications, IANA also reserves a set of special-use domain names.[17] This list contains domain names such as example, local, localhost, and test. Other top-level domain names containing trade marks are registered for corporate use. Cases include brands such as BMW, Google, and Canon.[18]

Second-level and lower level domains

[edit]

Below the top-level domains in the domain name hierarchy are the second-level domain (SLD) names. These are the names directly to the left of .com, .net, and the other top-level domains. As an example, in the domain example.co.uk, co is the second-level domain.

Next are third-level domains, which are written immediately to the left of a second-level domain. There can be fourth- and fifth-level domains, and so on, with virtually no limitation. Each label is separated by a full stop (dot). An example of an operational domain name with four levels of domain labels is sos.state.oh.us. 'sos' is said to be a sub-domain of 'state.oh.us', and 'state' a sub-domain of 'oh.us', etc. In general, subdomains are domains subordinate to their parent domain. An example of very deep levels of subdomain ordering are the IPv6 reverse resolution DNS zones, e.g., 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa, which is the reverse DNS resolution domain name for the IP address of a loopback interface, or the localhost name.

Second-level (or lower-level, depending on the established parent hierarchy) domain names are often created based on the name of a company (e.g., bbc.co.uk), product or service (e.g. hotmail.com). Below these levels, the next domain name component has been used to designate a particular host server. Therefore, ftp.example.com might be an FTP server, www.example.com would be a World Wide Web server, and mail.example.com could be an email server, each intended to perform only the implied function. Modern technology allows multiple physical servers with either different (cf. load balancing) or even identical addresses (cf. anycast) to serve a single hostname or domain name, or multiple domain names to be served by a single computer. The latter is very popular in Web hosting service centers, where service providers host the websites of many organizations on just a few servers.

The hierarchical DNS labels or components of domain names are separated in a fully qualified name by the full stop (dot, .).

Internationalized domain names

[edit]

The character set allowed in the Domain Name System is based on ASCII and does not allow the representation of names and words of many languages in their native scripts or alphabets. ICANN approved the Internationalized domain name (IDNA) system, which maps Unicode strings used in application user interfaces into the valid DNS character set by an encoding called Punycode. For example, københavn.eu is mapped to xn--kbenhavn-54a.eu. Many registries have adopted IDNA.

Domain name registration

[edit]

History

[edit]

The first commercial Internet domain name, in the TLD com, was registered on 15 March 1985 in the name symbolics.com by Symbolics Inc., a computer systems firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

By 1992, fewer than 15,000 com domains had been registered.

In the first quarter of 2015, 294 million domain names had been registered.[19] A large fraction of them are in the com TLD, which as of December 21, 2014, had 115.6 million domain names,[20] including 11.9 million online business and e-commerce sites, 4.3 million entertainment sites, 3.1 million finance related sites, and 1.8 million sports sites.[21] As of July 15, 2012, the com TLD had more registrations than all of the ccTLDs combined.[22]

As of December 31, 2023, 359.8 million domain names had been registered.[23]

Administration

[edit]

The right to use a domain name is delegated by domain name registrars, which are accredited by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the organization charged with overseeing the name and number systems of the Internet. In addition to ICANN, each top-level domain (TLD) is maintained and serviced technically by an administrative organization operating a registry. A registry is responsible for maintaining the database of names registered within the TLD it administers. The registry receives registration information from each domain name registrar authorized to assign names in the corresponding TLD and publishes the information using a special service, the WHOIS protocol.

Registries and registrars usually charge an annual fee for the service of delegating a domain name to a user and providing a default set of name servers. Often, this transaction is termed a sale or lease of the domain name, and the registrant may sometimes be called an "owner", but no such legal relationship is actually associated with the transaction, only the exclusive right to use the domain name. More correctly, authorized users are known as "registrants" or as "domain holders".

ICANN publishes the complete list of TLD registries and domain name registrars. Registrant information associated with domain names is maintained in an online database accessible with the WHOIS protocol. For most of the 250 country code top-level domains (ccTLDs), the domain registries maintain the WHOIS (Registrant, name servers, expiration dates, etc.) information.

Some domain name registries, often called network information centers (NIC), also function as registrars to end-users. The major generic top-level domain registries, such as for the com, net, org, info domains and others, use a registry-registrar model consisting of hundreds of domain name registrars (see lists at ICANN[24] or VeriSign).[25] In this method of management, the registry only manages the domain name database and the relationship with the registrars. The registrants (users of a domain name) are customers of the registrar, in some cases through additional layers of resellers.

There are also a few other alternative DNS root providers that try to compete or complement ICANN's role of domain name administration, however, most of them failed to receive wide recognition, and thus domain names offered by those alternative roots cannot be used universally on most other internet-connecting machines without additional dedicated configurations.

Technical requirements and process

[edit]

In the process of registering a domain name and maintaining authority over the new name space created, registrars use several key pieces of information connected with a domain:

  • Administrative contact. A registrant usually designates an administrative contact to manage the domain name. The administrative contact usually has the highest level of control over a domain. Management functions delegated to the administrative contacts may include management of all business information, such as name of record, postal address, and contact information of the official registrant of the domain and the obligation to conform to the requirements of the domain registry in order to retain the right to use a domain name. Furthermore, the administrative contact installs additional contact information for technical and billing functions.
  • Technical contact. The technical contact manages the name servers of a domain name. The functions of a technical contact include assuring conformance of the configurations of the domain name with the requirements of the domain registry, maintaining the domain zone records, and providing continuous functionality of the name servers (that leads to the accessibility of the domain name).
  • Billing contact. The party responsible for receiving billing invoices from the domain name registrar and paying applicable fees.
  • Name servers. Most registrars provide two or more name servers as part of the registration service. However, a registrant may specify its own authoritative name servers to host a domain's resource records. The registrar's policies govern the number of servers and the type of server information required. Some providers require a hostname and the corresponding IP address or just the hostname, which must be resolvable either in the new domain, or exist elsewhere. Based on traditional requirements (RFC 1034), typically a minimum of two servers is required.

A domain name consists of one or more labels, each of which is formed from the set of ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens (a–z, A–Z, 0–9, -), but not starting or ending with a hyphen. The labels are case-insensitive; for example, 'label' is equivalent to 'Label' or 'LABEL'. In the textual representation of a domain name, the labels are separated by a full stop (period).

Business models

[edit]

Domain names are often seen in analogy to real estate in that domain names are foundations on which a website can be built, and the highest quality domain names, like sought-after real estate, tend to carry significant value, usually due to their online brand-building potential, use in advertising, search engine optimization, and many other criteria.

A few companies have offered low-cost, below-cost or even free domain registration with a variety of models adopted to recoup the costs to the provider. These usually require that domains be hosted on their website within a framework or portal that includes advertising wrapped around the domain holder's content, revenue from which allows the provider to recoup the costs. Domain registrations were free of charge when the DNS was new. A domain holder may provide an infinite number of subdomains in their domain. For example, the owner of example.org could provide subdomains such as foo.example.org and foo.bar.example.org to interested parties.

Many desirable domain names are already assigned and users must search for other acceptable names, using Web-based search features, or WHOIS and dig operating system tools. Many registrars have implemented domain name suggestion tools which search domain name databases and suggest available alternative domain names related to keywords provided by the user.

Resale of domain names

[edit]

The business of resale of registered domain names is known as the domain aftermarket. Various factors influence the perceived value or market value of a domain name. Most of the high-prize domain sales are carried out privately.[26] Also, it is called confidential domain acquiring or anonymous domain acquiring.[27]

Domain name confusion

[edit]

Intercapping is often used to emphasize the meaning of a domain name, because DNS names are not case-sensitive. Some names may be misinterpreted in certain uses of capitalization. For example: Who Represents, a database of artists and agents, chose whorepresents.com,[28] which can be misread. In such situations, the proper meaning may be clarified by placement of hyphens when registering a domain name. For instance, Experts Exchange, a programmers' discussion site, used expertsexchange.com, but changed its domain name to experts-exchange.com.[29]

Uses in website hosting

[edit]

The domain name is a component of a uniform resource locator (URL) used to access websites, for example:

  • URL: http://www.example.net/index.html
  • Top-level domain: net
  • Second-level domain: example
  • Hostname: www

A domain name may point to multiple IP addresses to provide server redundancy for the services offered, a feature that is used to manage the traffic of large, popular websites.

Web hosting services, on the other hand, run servers that are typically assigned only one or a few addresses while serving websites for many domains, a technique referred to as virtual web hosting. Such IP address overloading requires that each request identifies the domain name being referenced, for instance by using the HTTP request header field Host:, or Server Name Indication.

Abuse and regulation

[edit]

Critics often claim abuse of administrative power over domain names. Particularly noteworthy was the VeriSign Site Finder system which redirected all unregistered .com and .net domains to a VeriSign webpage. For example, at a public meeting with VeriSign to air technical concerns about Site Finder,[30] numerous people, active in the IETF and other technical bodies, explained how they were surprised by VeriSign's changing the fundamental behavior of a major component of Internet infrastructure, not having obtained the customary consensus. Site Finder, at first, assumed every Internet query was for a website, and it monetized queries for incorrect domain names, taking the user to VeriSign's search site. Other applications, such as many implementations of email, treat a lack of response to a domain name query as an indication that the domain does not exist, and that the message can be treated as undeliverable. The original VeriSign implementation broke this assumption for mail, because it would always resolve an erroneous domain name to that of Site Finder. While VeriSign later changed Site Finder's behaviour with regard to email, there was still widespread protest about VeriSign's action being more in its financial interest than in the interest of the Internet infrastructure component for which VeriSign was the steward.

Despite widespread criticism, VeriSign only reluctantly removed it after the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) threatened to revoke its contract to administer the root name servers. ICANN published the extensive set of letters exchanged, committee reports, and ICANN decisions.[31]

There is also significant disquiet regarding the United States Government's political influence over ICANN. This was a significant issue in the attempt to create a .xxx top-level domain and sparked greater interest in alternative DNS roots that would be beyond the control of any single country.[32]

Additionally, there are numerous accusations of domain name front running, whereby registrars, when given whois queries, automatically register the domain name for themselves. Network Solutions has been accused of this.[33]

Truth in Domain Names Act

[edit]

In the United States, the Truth in Domain Names Act of 2003, in combination with the PROTECT Act of 2003, forbids the use of a misleading domain name with the intention of attracting Internet users into visiting Internet pornography sites.

The Truth in Domain Names Act follows the more general Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act passed in 1999 aimed at preventing typosquatting and deceptive use of names and trademarks in domain names.

Seizures

[edit]

In the early 21st century, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) pursued the seizure of domain names, based on the legal theory that domain names constitute property used to engage in criminal activity, and thus are subject to forfeiture. For example, in the seizure of the domain name of a gambling website, the DOJ referenced 18 U.S.C. § 981 and 18 U.S.C. § 1955(d).[34][1] In 2013 the US government seized Liberty Reserve, citing 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1).[35]

The U.S. Congress passed the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act in 2010. Consumer Electronics Association vice president Michael Petricone was worried that seizure was a blunt instrument that could harm legitimate businesses.[36][37] After a joint operation on February 15, 2011, the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security claimed to have seized ten domains of websites involved in advertising and distributing child pornography, but also mistakenly seized the domain name of a large DNS provider, temporarily replacing 84,000 websites with seizure notices.[38]

In the United Kingdom, the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) has been attempting to seize domain names from registrars without court orders.[39]

Suspensions

[edit]

PIPCU and other UK law enforcement organisations make domain suspension requests to Nominet which they process on the basis of breach of terms and conditions. Around 16,000 domains are suspended annually, and about 80% of the requests originate from PIPCU.[40]

Property rights

[edit]

Because of the economic value it represents, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the exclusive right to a domain name is protected as property under article 1 of Protocol 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights.[41]

IDN variants

[edit]

ICANN Business Constituency (BC) has spent decades trying to make IDN variants work at the second level, and in the last several years at the top level. Domain name variants are domain names recognized in different character encodings, like a single domain presented in traditional Chinese and simplified Chinese. It is an Internationalization and localization problem. Under Domain Name Variants, the different encodings of the domain name (in simplified and traditional Chinese) would resolve to the same host.[42][43]

According to John Levine, an expert on Internet related topics, "Unfortunately, variants don't work. The problem isn't putting them in the DNS, it's that once they're in the DNS, they don't work anywhere else."[42]

Fictitious domain name

[edit]

A fictitious domain name is a domain name used in a work of fiction or popular culture to refer to a domain that does not actually exist, often with invalid or unofficial top-level domains such as ".web", a usage exactly analogous to the dummy 555 telephone number prefix used in film and other media. The canonical fictitious domain name is "example.com", specifically set aside by IANA in RFC 2606 for such use, along with the .example TLD.

Domain names used in works of fiction have often been registered in the DNS, either by their creators or by cybersquatters attempting to profit from it. This phenomenon prompted NBC to purchase the domain name Hornymanatee.com after talk-show host Conan O'Brien spoke the name while ad-libbing on his show. O'Brien subsequently created a website based on the concept and used it as a running gag on the show.[44] Companies whose works have used fictitious domain names have also employed firms such as MarkMonitor to park fictional domain names in order to prevent misuse by third parties.[45]

Misspelled domain names

[edit]

Misspelled domain names, also known as typosquatting or URL hijacking, are domain names that are intentionally or unintentionally misspelled versions of popular or well-known domain names. The goal of misspelled domain names is to capitalize on internet users who accidentally type in a misspelled domain name, and are then redirected to a different website.

Misspelled domain names are often used for malicious purposes, such as phishing scams or distributing malware. In some cases, the owners of misspelled domain names may also attempt to sell the domain names to the owners of the legitimate domain names, or to individuals or organizations who are interested in capitalizing on the traffic generated by internet users who accidentally type in the misspelled domain names.

To avoid being caught by a misspelled domain name, internet users should be careful to type in domain names correctly, and should avoid clicking on links that appear suspicious or unfamiliar. Additionally, individuals and organizations who own popular or well-known domain names should consider registering common misspellings of their domain names in order to prevent others from using them for malicious purposes.

Domain name spoofing

[edit]

The term Domain name spoofing (or simply though less accurately, Domain spoofing) is used generically to describe one or more of a class of phishing attacks that depend on falsifying or misrepresenting an internet domain name.[46][47] These are designed to persuade unsuspecting users into visiting a web site other than that intended, or opening an email that is not in reality from the address shown (or apparently shown).[48] Although website and email spoofing attacks are more widely known, any service that relies on domain name resolution may be compromised.

Types

[edit]

There are a number of better-known types of domain spoofing:

The typosquatter's URL will usually be one of five kinds, all similar to the victim site address:
  • A common misspelling, or foreign language spelling, of the intended site
  • A misspelling based on a typographical error
  • A plural of a singular domain name
  • A different top-level domain: (i.e. .com instead of .org)
  • An abuse of the Country Code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) (.cm, .co, or .om instead of .com)
  • IDN homograph attack. This type of attack depends on registering a domain name that is similar to the 'target' domain, differing from it only because its spelling includes one or more characters that come from a different alphabet but look the same to the naked eye. For example, the Cyrillic, Latin, and Greek alphabets each have their own letter A, each of which has its own binary code point. Turkish has a dotless letter i (ı) that may not be perceived as different from the ASCII letter i. Most web browsers warn of 'mixed alphabet' domain names,[50][51][52][53] Other services, such as email applications, may not provide the same protection. Reputable top level domain and country code domain registrars will not accept applications to register a deceptive name but this policy cannot be presumed to be infallible.
  • DNS spoofing – Cyberattack using corrupt DNS data
  • Website spoofing – Creating a website, as a hoax, with the intention of misleading readers
  • Email spoofing – Creating email spam or phishing messages with a forged sender identity or address

Risk mitigation

[edit]

Legitimate technologies that may be subverted

[edit]
  • URL redirection – Technique for making a Web page available under more than one URL address
  • Domain fronting – Technique for Internet censorship circumvention

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Stevens, W. Richard (1994). TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1: The Protocols. Vol. 1 (1 ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 9780201633467.
  2. ^ Arends, R.; Austein, R.; Larson, M.; Massey, D.; Rose, S. (2005). RFC 4034 – Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions (Technical report). IEFT. doi:10.17487/RFC4034. Archived from the original on 2018-09-20. Retrieved 2015-07-05.
  3. ^ Low, Jerry. "Why are generic domains so expensive?". TheRealJerryLow.com. Archived from the original on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  4. ^ RFC 3467, Role of the Domain Name System (DNS), J.C. Klensin, J. Klensin (February 2003)
  5. ^ Cricket Liu, Paul Albitz (2006). DNS and BIND (5th ed.). O'Reilly. p. 3. Archived from the original on 2011-09-05. Retrieved 2011-10-22.
  6. ^ "The first ever 20 domain names registered". ComputerWeekly.com. Archived from the original on 2020-08-08. Retrieved 2020-07-30.
  7. ^ Rooksby, Jacob H. (2015). "Defining Domain: Higher Education's Battles for Cyberspace". Brooklyn Law Review. 80 (3): 857–942. Archived from the original on 2018-11-07. Retrieved 2015-10-27. at p. 869
  8. ^ Mockapetris, P. (November 1987). "Domain names - Implementation and specification (RFC 1035)". IETF Datatracker. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  9. ^ "Introduction to Top-Level Domains (gTLDs)". Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN). Archived from the original on 2009-06-15. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  10. ^ RFC 920, Domain Requirements, J. Postel, J. Reynolds, The Internet Society (October 1984)
  11. ^ "New gTLD Program" Archived 2011-11-25 at the Wayback Machine, ICANN, October 2009
  12. ^ "32nd International Public ICANN Meeting". ICANN. 2008-06-22. Archived from the original on 2009-03-08. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  13. ^ "New gTLS Program". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2011-09-10. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  14. ^ ICANN Board Approves Sweeping Overhaul of Top-level Domains Archived 2009-06-26 at the Wayback Machine, CircleID, 26 June 2008.
  15. ^ "About the Program - ICANN New gTLDs". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2016-11-03. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  16. ^ "Root Zone Database". IANA. Archived from the original on 2019-05-04. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
  17. ^ Cheshire, S.; Krochmal, M. (February 2013). "RFC6761 - Special-Use Domain Names". Internet Engineering Task Force. doi:10.17487/RFC6761. Archived from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
  18. ^ "Executive Summary - dot brand observatory". observatory.domains. Archived from the original on 2016-11-10. Retrieved 2016-11-09.
  19. ^ Internet Grows to 294 Million Domain Names in the First Quarter of 2015 Archived 2017-12-20 at the Wayback Machine, Jun 30, 2015.
  20. ^ "Thirty years of .COM domains - and the numbers are up". Geekzone. Mar 13, 2015. Archived from the original on April 7, 2016. Retrieved Mar 25, 2016.
  21. ^ Evangelista, Benny. 2010. "25 years of .com names." San Francisco Chronicle. March 15, p. 1
  22. ^ "Domain domination: The com TLD larger than all ccTLDs combined". Royal.pingdom.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-23. Retrieved 2012-07-25.
  23. ^ "DNIB Quarterly Report Q4 2023". Domain Name Industry Brief (DNIB). Retrieved 16 February 2024.
  24. ^ "ICANN-Accredited Registrars". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2019-05-19. Retrieved 2012-09-13.
  25. ^ "Choose A Top Domain Registrar Of Your Choice Using Our Search Tool". Verisign. Archived from the original on 2015-09-04. Retrieved 2015-08-10.
  26. ^ Arif, Sengoren (1 October 2024). "Confidentially domain acquiring".
  27. ^ "Anonymous Domain Ownership". Conference: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 1 October 2024.
  28. ^ Courtney, Curzi (14 October 2014). "WhoRepresents helps brands connect with celebrity influencers". DM News. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  29. ^ Ki, Mae Heussner (2 June 2010). "'Slurls': Most Outrageous Website URLs". ABC News. Archived from the original on 31 May 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  30. ^ McCullagh, Declan (2003-10-03). "VeriSign fends off critics at ICANN confab". CNET News. Archived from the original on January 4, 2013. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  31. ^ "Verisign's Wildcard Service Deployment". ICANN. Archived from the original on 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  32. ^ Mueller, M (March 2004). Ruling the Root. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-63298-5.
  33. ^ Slashdot.org Archived 2010-02-17 at the Wayback Machine, NSI Registers Every Domain Checked
  34. ^ FBI / DOJ (15 April 2011). "Warning". Archived from the original on 2011-04-14. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
  35. ^ Dia, Miaz (4 February 2010). "website laten maken". Kmowebdiensten. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2016.
  36. ^ Gabriel, Jeffrey (18 June 2020). "Past Congressional Attempts to Combat Online Copyright Infringement". Saw. Archived from the original on 2020-06-20. Retrieved 2020-06-19.
  37. ^ Jerome, Sarah (6 April 2011). "Tech industry wary of domain name seizures". The Hill. Archived from the original on 2011-04-10. Retrieved 2011-04-15.
  38. ^ "U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, 'By Mistake'". Archived from the original on 2018-12-25. Retrieved 2012-12-16.
  39. ^ Jeftovic, Mark (8 October 2013). "Whatever Happened to "Due Process" ?". Archived from the original on 5 December 2014. Retrieved 27 November 2014.
  40. ^ Tackling online criminal activity Archived 2017-12-16 at the Wayback Machine, 1 November 2016 – 31 October 2017, Nominet
  41. ^ ECHR 18 September 2007, no. 25379/04, 21688/05, 21722/05, 21770/05, Paeffgen v Germany.
  42. ^ a b Levine, John R. (April 21, 2019). "Domain Name Variants Still Won't Work". Archived from the original on July 29, 2020. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  43. ^ "Comment on ICANN Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains" (PDF). ICANN. April 21, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  44. ^ "So This Manatee Walks Into the Internet Archived 2017-01-23 at the Wayback Machine", The New York Times, December 12, 2006. Retrieved April 12, 2008.
  45. ^ Allemann, Andrew (2019-11-05). "Part of MarkMonitor sold to OpSec Security". Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News. Retrieved 2024-11-26.
  46. ^ "Canadian banks hit by two-year domain name spoofing scam". Finextra. 9 January 2020. Archived from the original on 6 November 2021. Retrieved 27 August 2021.
  47. ^ "Domain spoofing". Barracuda Networks. Archived from the original on 2021-11-04. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
  48. ^ Tara Seals (August 6, 2019). "Mass Spoofing Campaign Abuses Walmart Brand". threatpost. Archived from the original on November 6, 2021. Retrieved August 27, 2021.
  49. ^ "Example Screenshots of Strider URL Tracer With Typo-Patrol". Microsoft Research. Archived from the original on 21 December 2008.
  50. ^ "Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) in Google Chrome". chromium.googlesource.com. Archived from the original on 2020-11-01. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
  51. ^ "Upcoming update with IDN homograph phishing fix - Blog". Opera Security. 2017-04-21. Archived from the original on 2020-08-08. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
  52. ^ "About Safari International Domain Name support". Archived from the original on 2014-06-17. Retrieved 2017-04-29.
  53. ^ "IDN Display Algorithm". Mozilla. Archived from the original on 2016-01-31. Retrieved 2016-01-31.
[edit]

 

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

 

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of improving the quality and quantity of website traffic to a website or a web page from search engines.[1][2] SEO targets unpaid search traffic (usually referred to as "organic" results) rather than direct traffic, referral traffic, social media traffic, or paid traffic.

Unpaid search engine traffic may originate from a variety of kinds of searches, including image search, video search, academic search,[3] news search, and industry-specific vertical search engines.

As an Internet marketing strategy, SEO considers how search engines work, the computer-programmed algorithms that dictate search engine results, what people search for, the actual search queries or keywords typed into search engines, and which search engines are preferred by a target audience. SEO is performed because a website will receive more visitors from a search engine when websites rank higher within a search engine results page (SERP), with the aim of either converting the visitors or building brand awareness.[4]

History

[edit]

Webmasters and content providers began optimizing websites for search engines in the mid-1990s, as the first search engines were cataloging the early Web. Initially, webmasters submitted the address of a page, or URL to the various search engines, which would send a web crawler to crawl that page, extract links to other pages from it, and return information found on the page to be indexed.[5]

According to a 2004 article by former industry analyst and current Google employee Danny Sullivan, the phrase "search engine optimization" probably came into use in 1997. Sullivan credits SEO practitioner Bruce Clay as one of the first people to popularize the term.[6]

Early versions of search algorithms relied on webmaster-provided information such as the keyword meta tag or index files in engines like ALIWEB. Meta tags provide a guide to each page's content. Using metadata to index pages was found to be less than reliable, however, because the webmaster's choice of keywords in the meta tag could potentially be an inaccurate representation of the site's actual content. Flawed data in meta tags, such as those that were inaccurate or incomplete, created the potential for pages to be mischaracterized in irrelevant searches.[7][dubiousdiscuss] Web content providers also manipulated attributes within the HTML source of a page in an attempt to rank well in search engines.[8] By 1997, search engine designers recognized that webmasters were making efforts to rank in search engines and that some webmasters were manipulating their rankings in search results by stuffing pages with excessive or irrelevant keywords. Early search engines, such as Altavista and Infoseek, adjusted their algorithms to prevent webmasters from manipulating rankings.[9]

By heavily relying on factors such as keyword density, which were exclusively within a webmaster's control, early search engines suffered from abuse and ranking manipulation. To provide better results to their users, search engines had to adapt to ensure their results pages showed the most relevant search results, rather than unrelated pages stuffed with numerous keywords by unscrupulous webmasters. This meant moving away from heavy reliance on term density to a more holistic process for scoring semantic signals.[10]

Search engines responded by developing more complex ranking algorithms, taking into account additional factors that were more difficult for webmasters to manipulate.[citation needed]

Some search engines have also reached out to the SEO industry and are frequent sponsors and guests at SEO conferences, webchats, and seminars. Major search engines provide information and guidelines to help with website optimization.[11][12] Google has a Sitemaps program to help webmasters learn if Google is having any problems indexing their website and also provides data on Google traffic to the website.[13] Bing Webmaster Tools provides a way for webmasters to submit a sitemap and web feeds, allows users to determine the "crawl rate", and track the web pages index status.

In 2015, it was reported that Google was developing and promoting mobile search as a key feature within future products. In response, many brands began to take a different approach to their Internet marketing strategies.[14]

Relationship with Google

[edit]

In 1998, two graduate students at Stanford University, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developed "Backrub", a search engine that relied on a mathematical algorithm to rate the prominence of web pages. The number calculated by the algorithm, PageRank, is a function of the quantity and strength of inbound links.[15] PageRank estimates the likelihood that a given page will be reached by a web user who randomly surfs the web and follows links from one page to another. In effect, this means that some links are stronger than others, as a higher PageRank page is more likely to be reached by the random web surfer.

Page and Brin founded Google in 1998.[16] Google attracted a loyal following among the growing number of Internet users, who liked its simple design.[17] Off-page factors (such as PageRank and hyperlink analysis) were considered as well as on-page factors (such as keyword frequency, meta tags, headings, links and site structure) to enable Google to avoid the kind of manipulation seen in search engines that only considered on-page factors for their rankings. Although PageRank was more difficult to game, webmasters had already developed link-building tools and schemes to influence the Inktomi search engine, and these methods proved similarly applicable to gaming PageRank. Many sites focus on exchanging, buying, and selling links, often on a massive scale. Some of these schemes involved the creation of thousands of sites for the sole purpose of link spamming.[18]

By 2004, search engines had incorporated a wide range of undisclosed factors in their ranking algorithms to reduce the impact of link manipulation.[19] The leading search engines, Google, Bing, and Yahoo, do not disclose the algorithms they use to rank pages. Some SEO practitioners have studied different approaches to search engine optimization and have shared their personal opinions.[20] Patents related to search engines can provide information to better understand search engines.[21] In 2005, Google began personalizing search results for each user. Depending on their history of previous searches, Google crafted results for logged in users.[22]

In 2007, Google announced a campaign against paid links that transfer PageRank.[23] On June 15, 2009, Google disclosed that they had taken measures to mitigate the effects of PageRank sculpting by use of the nofollow attribute on links. Matt Cutts, a well-known software engineer at Google, announced that Google Bot would no longer treat any no follow links, in the same way, to prevent SEO service providers from using nofollow for PageRank sculpting.[24] As a result of this change, the usage of nofollow led to evaporation of PageRank. In order to avoid the above, SEO engineers developed alternative techniques that replace nofollowed tags with obfuscated JavaScript and thus permit PageRank sculpting. Additionally, several solutions have been suggested that include the usage of iframes, Flash, and JavaScript.[25]

In December 2009, Google announced it would be using the web search history of all its users in order to populate search results.[26] On June 8, 2010 a new web indexing system called Google Caffeine was announced. Designed to allow users to find news results, forum posts, and other content much sooner after publishing than before, Google Caffeine was a change to the way Google updated its index in order to make things show up quicker on Google than before. According to Carrie Grimes, the software engineer who announced Caffeine for Google, "Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index..."[27] Google Instant, real-time-search, was introduced in late 2010 in an attempt to make search results more timely and relevant. Historically site administrators have spent months or even years optimizing a website to increase search rankings. With the growth in popularity of social media sites and blogs, the leading engines made changes to their algorithms to allow fresh content to rank quickly within the search results.[28]

In February 2011, Google announced the Panda update, which penalizes websites containing content duplicated from other websites and sources. Historically websites have copied content from one another and benefited in search engine rankings by engaging in this practice. However, Google implemented a new system that punishes sites whose content is not unique.[29] The 2012 Google Penguin attempted to penalize websites that used manipulative techniques to improve their rankings on the search engine.[30] Although Google Penguin has been presented as an algorithm aimed at fighting web spam, it really focuses on spammy links[31] by gauging the quality of the sites the links are coming from. The 2013 Google Hummingbird update featured an algorithm change designed to improve Google's natural language processing and semantic understanding of web pages. Hummingbird's language processing system falls under the newly recognized term of "conversational search", where the system pays more attention to each word in the query in order to better match the pages to the meaning of the query rather than a few words.[32] With regards to the changes made to search engine optimization, for content publishers and writers, Hummingbird is intended to resolve issues by getting rid of irrelevant content and spam, allowing Google to produce high-quality content and rely on them to be 'trusted' authors.

In October 2019, Google announced they would start applying BERT models for English language search queries in the US. Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was another attempt by Google to improve their natural language processing, but this time in order to better understand the search queries of their users.[33] In terms of search engine optimization, BERT intended to connect users more easily to relevant content and increase the quality of traffic coming to websites that are ranking in the Search Engine Results Page.

Methods

[edit]

Getting indexed

[edit]
A simple illustration of the Pagerank algorithm. Percentage shows the perceived importance.

The leading search engines, such as Google, Bing, and Yahoo!, use crawlers to find pages for their algorithmic search results. Pages that are linked from other search engine-indexed pages do not need to be submitted because they are found automatically. The Yahoo! Directory and DMOZ, two major directories which closed in 2014 and 2017 respectively, both required manual submission and human editorial review.[34] Google offers Google Search Console, for which an XML Sitemap feed can be created and submitted for free to ensure that all pages are found, especially pages that are not discoverable by automatically following links[35] in addition to their URL submission console.[36] Yahoo! formerly operated a paid submission service that guaranteed to crawl for a cost per click;[37] however, this practice was discontinued in 2009.

Search engine crawlers may look at a number of different factors when crawling a site. Not every page is indexed by search engines. The distance of pages from the root directory of a site may also be a factor in whether or not pages get crawled.[38]

Mobile devices are used for the majority of Google searches.[39] In November 2016, Google announced a major change to the way they are crawling websites and started to make their index mobile-first, which means the mobile version of a given website becomes the starting point for what Google includes in their index.[40] In May 2019, Google updated the rendering engine of their crawler to be the latest version of Chromium (74 at the time of the announcement). Google indicated that they would regularly update the Chromium rendering engine to the latest version.[41] In December 2019, Google began updating the User-Agent string of their crawler to reflect the latest Chrome version used by their rendering service. The delay was to allow webmasters time to update their code that responded to particular bot User-Agent strings. Google ran evaluations and felt confident the impact would be minor.[42]

Preventing crawling

[edit]

To avoid undesirable content in the search indexes, webmasters can instruct spiders not to crawl certain files or directories through the standard robots.txt file in the root directory of the domain. Additionally, a page can be explicitly excluded from a search engine's database by using a meta tag specific to robots (usually <meta name="robots" content="noindex"> ). When a search engine visits a site, the robots.txt located in the root directory is the first file crawled. The robots.txt file is then parsed and will instruct the robot as to which pages are not to be crawled. As a search engine crawler may keep a cached copy of this file, it may on occasion crawl pages a webmaster does not wish to crawl. Pages typically prevented from being crawled include login-specific pages such as shopping carts and user-specific content such as search results from internal searches. In March 2007, Google warned webmasters that they should prevent indexing of internal search results because those pages are considered search spam.[43]

In 2020, Google sunsetted the standard (and open-sourced their code) and now treats it as a hint rather than a directive. To adequately ensure that pages are not indexed, a page-level robot's meta tag should be included.[44]

Increasing prominence

[edit]

A variety of methods can increase the prominence of a webpage within the search results. Cross linking between pages of the same website to provide more links to important pages may improve its visibility. Page design makes users trust a site and want to stay once they find it. When people bounce off a site, it counts against the site and affects its credibility.[45]

Writing content that includes frequently searched keyword phrases so as to be relevant to a wide variety of search queries will tend to increase traffic. Updating content so as to keep search engines crawling back frequently can give additional weight to a site. Adding relevant keywords to a web page's metadata, including the title tag and meta description, will tend to improve the relevancy of a site's search listings, thus increasing traffic. URL canonicalization of web pages accessible via multiple URLs, using the canonical link element[46] or via 301 redirects can help make sure links to different versions of the URL all count towards the page's link popularity score. These are known as incoming links, which point to the URL and can count towards the page link's popularity score, impacting the credibility of a website.[45]

White hat versus black hat techniques

[edit]
Common white-hat methods of search engine optimization

SEO techniques can be classified into two broad categories: techniques that search engine companies recommend as part of good design ("white hat"), and those techniques of which search engines do not approve ("black hat"). Search engines attempt to minimize the effect of the latter, among them spamdexing. Industry commentators have classified these methods and the practitioners who employ them as either white hat SEO or black hat SEO.[47] White hats tend to produce results that last a long time, whereas black hats anticipate that their sites may eventually be banned either temporarily or permanently once the search engines discover what they are doing.[48]

An SEO technique is considered a white hat if it conforms to the search engines' guidelines and involves no deception. As the search engine guidelines[11][12][49] are not written as a series of rules or commandments, this is an important distinction to note. White hat SEO is not just about following guidelines but is about ensuring that the content a search engine indexes and subsequently ranks is the same content a user will see. White hat advice is generally summed up as creating content for users, not for search engines, and then making that content easily accessible to the online "spider" algorithms, rather than attempting to trick the algorithm from its intended purpose. White hat SEO is in many ways similar to web development that promotes accessibility,[50] although the two are not identical.

Black hat SEO attempts to improve rankings in ways that are disapproved of by the search engines or involve deception. One black hat technique uses hidden text, either as text colored similar to the background, in an invisible div, or positioned off-screen. Another method gives a different page depending on whether the page is being requested by a human visitor or a search engine, a technique known as cloaking. Another category sometimes used is grey hat SEO. This is in between the black hat and white hat approaches, where the methods employed avoid the site being penalized but do not act in producing the best content for users. Grey hat SEO is entirely focused on improving search engine rankings.

Search engines may penalize sites they discover using black or grey hat methods, either by reducing their rankings or eliminating their listings from their databases altogether. Such penalties can be applied either automatically by the search engines' algorithms or by a manual site review. One example was the February 2006 Google removal of both BMW Germany and Ricoh Germany for the use of deceptive practices.[51] Both companies subsequently apologized, fixed the offending pages, and were restored to Google's search engine results page.[52]

Companies that employ black hat techniques or other spammy tactics can get their client websites banned from the search results. In 2005, the Wall Street Journal reported on a company, Traffic Power, which allegedly used high-risk techniques and failed to disclose those risks to its clients.[53] Wired magazine reported that the same company sued blogger and SEO Aaron Wall for writing about the ban.[54] Google's Matt Cutts later confirmed that Google had banned Traffic Power and some of its clients.[55]

As marketing strategy

[edit]

SEO is not an appropriate strategy for every website, and other Internet marketing strategies can be more effective, such as paid advertising through pay-per-click (PPC) campaigns, depending on the site operator's goals.[editorializing] Search engine marketing (SEM) is the practice of designing, running, and optimizing search engine ad campaigns. Its difference from SEO is most simply depicted as the difference between paid and unpaid priority ranking in search results. SEM focuses on prominence more so than relevance; website developers should regard SEM with the utmost importance with consideration to visibility as most navigate to the primary listings of their search.[56] A successful Internet marketing campaign may also depend upon building high-quality web pages to engage and persuade internet users, setting up analytics programs to enable site owners to measure results, and improving a site's conversion rate.[57][58] In November 2015, Google released a full 160-page version of its Search Quality Rating Guidelines to the public,[59] which revealed a shift in their focus towards "usefulness" and mobile local search. In recent years the mobile market has exploded, overtaking the use of desktops, as shown in by StatCounter in October 2016, where they analyzed 2.5 million websites and found that 51.3% of the pages were loaded by a mobile device.[60] Google has been one of the companies that are utilizing the popularity of mobile usage by encouraging websites to use their Google Search Console, the Mobile-Friendly Test, which allows companies to measure up their website to the search engine results and determine how user-friendly their websites are. The closer the keywords are together their ranking will improve based on key terms.[45]

SEO may generate an adequate return on investment. However, search engines are not paid for organic search traffic, their algorithms change, and there are no guarantees of continued referrals. Due to this lack of guarantee and uncertainty, a business that relies heavily on search engine traffic can suffer major losses if the search engines stop sending visitors.[61] Search engines can change their algorithms, impacting a website's search engine ranking, possibly resulting in a serious loss of traffic. According to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, in 2010, Google made over 500 algorithm changes – almost 1.5 per day.[62] It is considered a wise business practice for website operators to liberate themselves from dependence on search engine traffic.[63] In addition to accessibility in terms of web crawlers (addressed above), user web accessibility has become increasingly important for SEO.

International markets and SEO

[edit]

Optimization techniques are highly tuned to the dominant search engines in the target market. The search engines' market shares vary from market to market, as does competition. In 2003, Danny Sullivan stated that Google represented about 75% of all searches.[64] In markets outside the United States, Google's share is often larger, and data showed Google was the dominant search engine worldwide as of 2007.[65] As of 2006, Google had an 85–90% market share in Germany.[66] While there were hundreds of SEO firms in the US at that time, there were only about five in Germany.[66] As of March 2024, Google still had a significant market share of 89.85% in Germany.[67] As of June 2008, the market share of Google in the UK was close to 90% according to Hitwise.[68][obsolete source] As of March 2024, Google's market share in the UK was 93.61%.[69]

Successful search engine optimization (SEO) for international markets requires more than just translating web pages. It may also involve registering a domain name with a country-code top-level domain (ccTLD) or a relevant top-level domain (TLD) for the target market, choosing web hosting with a local IP address or server, and using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to improve website speed and performance globally. It is also important to understand the local culture so that the content feels relevant to the audience. This includes conducting keyword research for each market, using hreflang tags to target the right languages, and building local backlinks. However, the core SEO principles—such as creating high-quality content, improving user experience, and building links—remain the same, regardless of language or region.[66]

Regional search engines have a strong presence in specific markets:

  • China: Baidu leads the market, controlling about 70 to 80% market share.[70]
  • South Korea: Since the end of 2021, Naver, a domestic web portal, has gained prominence in the country.[71][72]
  • Russia: Yandex is the leading search engine in Russia. As of December 2023, it accounted for at least 63.8% of the market share.[73]

The Evolution of International SEO

[edit]

By the early 2000s, businesses recognized that the web and search engines could help them reach global audiences. As a result, the need for multilingual SEO emerged.[74] In the early years of international SEO development, simple translation was seen as sufficient. However, over time, it became clear that localization and transcreation—adapting content to local language, culture, and emotional resonance—were far more effective than basic translation.[75]

[edit]

On October 17, 2002, SearchKing filed suit in the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma, against the search engine Google. SearchKing's claim was that Google's tactics to prevent spamdexing constituted a tortious interference with contractual relations. On May 27, 2003, the court granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint because SearchKing "failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted."[76][77]

In March 2006, KinderStart filed a lawsuit against Google over search engine rankings. KinderStart's website was removed from Google's index prior to the lawsuit, and the amount of traffic to the site dropped by 70%. On March 16, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) dismissed KinderStart's complaint without leave to amend and partially granted Google's motion for Rule 11 sanctions against KinderStart's attorney, requiring him to pay part of Google's legal expenses.[78][79]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "SEO – search engine optimization". Webopedia. December 19, 2001. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
  2. ^ Giomelakis, Dimitrios; Veglis, Andreas (April 2, 2016). "Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites: The case of Greece". Digital Journalism. 4 (3): 379–400. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1046992. ISSN 2167-0811. S2CID 166902013. Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  3. ^ Beel, Jöran; Gipp, Bela; Wilde, Erik (2010). "Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar and Co" (PDF). Journal of Scholarly Publishing. pp. 176–190. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2010.
  4. ^ Ortiz-Cordova, A. and Jansen, B. J. (2012) Classifying Web Search Queries in Order to Identify High Revenue Generating Customers. Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology. 63(7), 1426 – 1441.
  5. ^ Brian Pinkerton. "Finding What People Want: Experiences with the WebCrawler" (PDF). The Second International WWW Conference Chicago, USA, October 17–20, 1994. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 8, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  6. ^ Danny Sullivan (June 14, 2004). "Who Invented the Term "Search Engine Optimization"?". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on April 23, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007. See Google groups thread Archived June 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
  7. ^ "The Challenge is Open", Brain vs Computer, WORLD SCIENTIFIC, November 17, 2020, pp. 189–211, doi:10.1142/9789811225017_0009, ISBN 978-981-12-2500-0, S2CID 243130517
  8. ^ Pringle, G.; Allison, L.; Dowe, D. (April 1998). "What is a tall poppy among web pages?". Monash University. Archived from the original on April 27, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  9. ^ Laurie J. Flynn (November 11, 1996). "Desperately Seeking Surfers". New York Times. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  10. ^ Jason Demers (January 20, 2016). "Is Keyword Density Still Important for SEO". Forbes. Archived from the original on August 16, 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2016.
  11. ^ a b "Google's Guidelines on Site Design". Archived from the original on January 9, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  12. ^ a b "Bing Webmaster Guidelines". bing.com. Archived from the original on September 9, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
  13. ^ "Sitemaps". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  14. ^ ""By the Data: For Consumers, Mobile is the Internet" Google for Entrepreneurs Startup Grind September 20, 2015". Archived from the original on January 6, 2016. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  15. ^ Brin, Sergey & Page, Larry (1998). "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine". Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web. pp. 107–117. Archived from the original on October 10, 2006. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  16. ^ "Co-founders of Google - Google's co-founders may not have the name recognition of say, Bill Gates, but give them time: Google hasn't been around nearly as long as Microsoft". Entrepreneur. October 15, 2008. Archived from the original on May 31, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2014.
  17. ^ Thompson, Bill (December 19, 2003). "Is Google good for you?". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved May 16, 2007.
  18. ^ Zoltan Gyongyi & Hector Garcia-Molina (2005). "Link Spam Alliances" (PDF). Proceedings of the 31st VLDB Conference, Trondheim, Norway. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  19. ^ Hansell, Saul (June 3, 2007). "Google Keeps Tweaking Its Search Engine". New York Times. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2007.
  20. ^ Sullivan, Danny (September 29, 2005). "Rundown On Search Ranking Factors". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 28, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  21. ^ Christine Churchill (November 23, 2005). "Understanding Search Engine Patents". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007. Retrieved May 8, 2007.
  22. ^ "Google Personalized Search Leaves Google Labs". searchenginewatch.com. Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 25, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
  23. ^ "8 Things We Learned About Google PageRank". www.searchenginejournal.com. October 25, 2007. Archived from the original on August 19, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  24. ^ "PageRank sculpting". Matt Cutts. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2010.
  25. ^ "Google Loses "Backwards Compatibility" On Paid Link Blocking & PageRank Sculpting". searchengineland.com. June 3, 2009. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved August 17, 2009.
  26. ^ "Personalized Search for everyone". Archived from the original on December 8, 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2009.
  27. ^ "Our new search index: Caffeine". Google: Official Blog. Archived from the original on June 18, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2014.
  28. ^ "Relevance Meets Real-Time Web". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 7, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2010.
  29. ^ "Google Search Quality Updates". Google Blog. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  30. ^ "What You Need to Know About Google's Penguin Update". Inc.com. June 20, 2012. Archived from the original on December 20, 2012. Retrieved December 6, 2012.
  31. ^ "Google Penguin looks mostly at your link source, says Google". Search Engine Land. October 10, 2016. Archived from the original on April 21, 2017. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  32. ^ "FAQ: All About The New Google "Hummingbird" Algorithm". www.searchengineland.com. September 26, 2013. Archived from the original on December 23, 2018. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  33. ^ "Understanding searches better than ever before". Google. October 25, 2019. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
  34. ^ "Submitting To Directories: Yahoo & The Open Directory". Search Engine Watch. March 12, 2007. Archived from the original on May 19, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  35. ^ "What is a Sitemap file and why should I have one?". Archived from the original on July 1, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2007.
  36. ^ "Search Console - Crawl URL". Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  37. ^ Sullivan, Danny (March 12, 2007). "Submitting To Search Crawlers: Google, Yahoo, Ask & Microsoft's Live Search". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  38. ^ Cho, J.; Garcia-Molina, H.; Page, L. (1998). "Efficient crawling through URL ordering". Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference. Brisbane, Australia: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server. Archived from the original on July 14, 2019. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  39. ^ "Mobile-first Index". Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  40. ^ Phan, Doantam (November 4, 2016). "Mobile-first Indexing". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved January 16, 2019.
  41. ^ "The new evergreen Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  42. ^ "Updating the user agent of Googlebot". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Archived from the original on March 2, 2020. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  43. ^ "Newspapers Amok! New York Times Spamming Google? LA Times Hijacking Cars.com?". Search Engine Land. May 8, 2007. Archived from the original on December 26, 2008. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  44. ^ Jill Kocher Brown (February 24, 2020). "Google Downgrades Nofollow Directive. Now What?". Practical Ecommerce. Archived from the original on January 25, 2021. Retrieved February 11, 2021.
  45. ^ a b c Morey, Sean (2008). The Digital Writer. Fountainhead Press. pp. 171–187.
  46. ^ "Bing – Partnering to help solve duplicate content issues – Webmaster Blog – Bing Community". www.bing.com. February 12, 2009. Archived from the original on June 7, 2014. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
  47. ^ Andrew Goodman. "Search Engine Showdown: Black hats vs. White hats at SES". SearchEngineWatch. Archived from the original on February 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  48. ^ Jill Whalen (November 16, 2004). "Black Hat/White Hat Search Engine Optimization". searchengineguide.com. Archived from the original on November 17, 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  49. ^ "What's an SEO? Does Google recommend working with companies that offer to make my site Google-friendly?". Archived from the original on April 16, 2006. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  50. ^ Andy Hagans (November 8, 2005). "High Accessibility Is Effective Search Engine Optimization". A List Apart. Archived from the original on May 4, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  51. ^ Matt Cutts (February 4, 2006). "Ramping up on international webspam". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  52. ^ Matt Cutts (February 7, 2006). "Recent reinclusions". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on May 22, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  53. ^ David Kesmodel (September 22, 2005). "Sites Get Dropped by Search Engines After Trying to 'Optimize' Rankings". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2008.
  54. ^ Adam L. Penenberg (September 8, 2005). "Legal Showdown in Search Fracas". Wired Magazine. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 11, 2016.
  55. ^ Matt Cutts (February 2, 2006). "Confirming a penalty". mattcutts.com/blog. Archived from the original on June 26, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  56. ^ Tapan, Panda (2013). "Search Engine Marketing: Does the Knowledge Discovery Process Help Online Retailers?". IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 11 (3): 56–66. ProQuest 1430517207.
  57. ^ Melissa Burdon (March 13, 2007). "The Battle Between Search Engine Optimization and Conversion: Who Wins?". Grok.com. Archived from the original on March 15, 2008. Retrieved April 10, 2017.
  58. ^ "SEO Tips and Marketing Strategies". Archived from the original on October 30, 2022. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
  59. ^ ""Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" How Search Works November 12, 2015" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved January 11, 2016.
  60. ^ Titcomb, James (November 2016). "Mobile web usage overtakes desktop for first time". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved March 17, 2018.
  61. ^ Andy Greenberg (April 30, 2007). "Condemned To Google Hell". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved May 9, 2007.
  62. ^ Matt McGee (September 21, 2011). "Schmidt's testimony reveals how Google tests algorithm changes". Archived from the original on January 17, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2012.
  63. ^ Jakob Nielsen (January 9, 2006). "Search Engines as Leeches on the Web". useit.com. Archived from the original on August 25, 2012. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  64. ^ Graham, Jefferson (August 26, 2003). "The search engine that could". USA Today. Archived from the original on May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  65. ^ Greg Jarboe (February 22, 2007). "Stats Show Google Dominates the International Search Landscape". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on May 23, 2011. Retrieved May 15, 2007.
  66. ^ a b c Mike Grehan (April 3, 2006). "Search Engine Optimizing for Europe". Click. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2007.
  67. ^ "Germany search engine market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  68. ^ Jack Schofield (June 10, 2008). "Google UK closes in on 90% market share". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved June 10, 2008.
  69. ^ "UK search engines market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  70. ^ "China search engines market share 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  71. ^ cycles, This text provides general information Statista assumes no liability for the information given being complete or correct Due to varying update; Text, Statistics Can Display More up-to-Date Data Than Referenced in the. "Topic: Search engines in South Korea". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  72. ^ "South Korea: main service used to search for information 2024". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  73. ^ "Most popular search engines in Russia 2023". Statista. Retrieved January 6, 2025.
  74. ^ Arora, Sanjog; Hemrajani, Naveen (September 2023). "A REVIEW ON: MULTILINGUAL SEARCH TECHNIQUE". International Journal of Applied Engineering & Technology. 5 (3): 760–770 – via ResearchGate.
  75. ^ "SEO Starter Guide: The Basics | Google Search Central | Documentation". Google for Developers. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
  76. ^ "Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc., CIV-02-1457-M" (PDF). docstoc.com. May 27, 2003. Archived from the original on May 27, 2008. Retrieved May 23, 2008.
  77. ^ Stefanie Olsen (May 30, 2003). "Judge dismisses suit against Google". CNET. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved May 10, 2007.
  78. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: KinderStart v. Google Dismissed—With Sanctions Against KinderStart's Counsel". blog.ericgoldman.org. March 20, 2007. Archived from the original on May 11, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
  79. ^ "Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Google Sued Over Rankings—KinderStart.com v. Google". blog.ericgoldman.org. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2008.
[edit]
Listen to this article (22 minutes)
 
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 20 May 2008 (2008-5-20), and does not reflect subsequent edits.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

An SEO consultant in Sydney can provide tailored advice and strategies that align with your business's goals and local market conditions. They bring expertise in keyword selection, content optimization, technical SEO, and performance monitoring, helping you achieve better search rankings and more organic traffic.

A content agency in Sydney focuses on creating high-quality, SEO-optimized content that resonates with your target audience. Their services typically include blog writing, website copy, video production, and other forms of media designed to attract traffic and improve search rankings.

SEO consultants are responsible for improving your website's visibility and performance in search engines. By analyzing data, refining keyword strategies, and optimizing site elements, they enhance your overall digital marketing efforts, leading to more traffic, better user engagement, and higher conversions.

SEO consulting involves analyzing a website's current performance, identifying areas for improvement, and recommending strategies to boost search rankings. Consultants provide insights on keyword selection, on-page and technical optimization, content development, and link-building tactics.

Local SEO services in Sydney focus on optimizing a business's online presence to attract local customers. This includes claiming local business listings, optimizing Google My Business profiles, using location-specific keywords, and ensuring consistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone) information across the web.